Which case is associated with the interpretation of the 14th Amendment?

Monroe v. Pape is indeed associated with the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, specifically involving Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. This case addressed the issue of police officers violating individuals' civil rights. The Supreme Court held that individuals could bring lawsuits against state officials for actions taken under the color of state law that infringe upon their constitutional rights, including those guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment is crucial as it addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law, ensuring that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Monroe v. Pape reinforced the ability of individuals to seek justice for violations of these rights by enabling them to hold law enforcement accountable for their actions.

In contrast, while Roe v. Wade is fundamentally concerned with a woman's right to privacy and reproductive rights under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, it does not primarily interpret the 14th Amendment in the same way as Monroe v. Pape. Miranda v. Arizona focuses on the rights of the accused and the necessity of advisements during interrogations rather than the broader civil rights protections under the 14th Amendment. Tennessee v. Garner deals with the use of deadly force by