Under what conditions is a person held criminally responsible for an offense?

A person is held criminally responsible for an offense when the offense is committed through their own conduct or the conduct of another. This principle recognizes that an individual can be accountable not only for their own actions but also for actions taken by others when those actions are part of a jointly committed offense. This understanding is pivotal in criminal law, as it establishes the basis for liability in situations where one may be involved in a conspiracy, aiding, or abetting another person in the commission of a crime.

This approach allows for a broader interpretation of responsibility, ensuring that individuals who contribute to or facilitate the commission of a crime, even indirectly, can be held accountable. This promotes a sense of justice that all parties involved in criminal activities, regardless of their direct involvement, face consequences for their actions.

Given this context, the other options do not adequately encompass the full scope of criminal responsibility. For instance, committing an offense alone does not automatically mean a person is criminally responsible unless their conduct meets other criteria established by law. Similarly, being accused of a crime due to another person's actions without any involvement or contribution on the part of the accused would not hold them criminally liable. While the presence of a victim may be relevant to certain offenses, it is not a